ωϊΪΪϊαm §öö’s ßlöġ

22 July, 2007

Harry Potter Price War

Filed under: Blogs, Rant — ωϊΪΪϊαm §öö @ 6:30 pm

I read today’s paper on the price war over the final Harry Potter book.

PETALING JAYA: The Malaysia Bookseller Association’s 100-odd members nationwide will meet next week to decide their next course of action over the Harry Potter price war that has erupted here.

“The worst case scenario would be to return the books to the publisher,” said its president Cheah Thye Wee.

MPH, Popular Bookstore and Times on Friday announced they would not sell Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows after Carrefour and Tesco hypermarkets advertised that they were selling the books at RM69.90.

The bookstores, with a total of 100 outlets in Malaysia, have priced theirs at RM109.90.

They said they were protesting the “indiscriminate price discount,” adding that it was not fair of distributor Penguin Books to “allow hypermarkets to sell such a popular book when they are not in the book business.”

Penguin Singapore and Malaysia managing director Eddy Teo said the hypermarkets would incur losses by selling the novel at a cheaper price, pointing out that their purchase price was actually higher.

He said there would be no replenishment on top of the opening order due to unavailability of stocks and the British publisher of the novel, Bloomsbury, had no plans for reprints now.

Cheah said his association was shocked and disappointed with the price under-cutting of the seventh and final book in British author J.K. Rowling’s bestselling series.

Hypermarkets should be giving discounts on milk power, rice and other necessities that benefited a larger population of the country, and not use bestsellers to attract customers to their outlets, he said on Saturday.

He said those in the business had waited for two years for the book to be released, and it would have been understandable if the hypermarkets sold the book for RM69.90 a year later, but to do so on the day of its launch was “ridiculous.”

He strongly supported the decision of the four major bookstore chains to not sell the book.

“We will stand by them,” he added.

After going through that I must say I’m siding with the Hypermarkets. To me, the Bookseller Association is acting childishly.

Like an earlier report says, this is a free market and as such, it’s up to the Hypermarkets to sell what they want at whatever price they think will make a profit. Mind you, profit here could have been in the long run.

Who gives a $hit when Carrefour sells them at half the price? For their strategy, it could mean that they are planning to recoup the loss later in terms of increased patron to their establishments.

Likewise, for a supposedly bookstore to NOT sell Harry Potter books on it’s biggest worldwide launch just speaks of ’stupidity’ all over. Imagine the loss of retail, the loss of future patrons, the ruined relationship with their customers when they cancelled all HP events speaks badly of their PR skills.

I had always believed forming Unions or Association always make it’s member feel protected. That they had a sense of belonging with care and support of it’s members (HAHAHAHA). In other words, pampered. That’s why they felt the need to cry when they got undercut in price.

Speaking of which, saying that Carrefour should not sell books is absurd. Who dictates what they can or cannot sell? The association’s members? I don’t think so. Neither is there any law that says that.

Hypermarkets should be giving discounts on milk power, rice and other necessities that benefited a larger population of the country, and not use bestsellers to attract customers to their outlets, he said

See (above)? Plain stupidity at work. A discount is a discount, no matter for what items on sale. If I’m the owner of Carrefour, I’d probably retort something like “Bookstores should sell books and leave the audio CD’s to studios.”

:)

I’ve seen through some other blog post that “to help the bookstore in the long run, we should buy from them and not hypermarts” or something to that matter, but most of them seem to forget that demand is also a factor in economics. Hypermarts stock up the latest and best sellers but people still do visit a bookstore for other non-mainstream books.

So what bookstores have now been delegated to selling non-mainstream books? No one is prohibiting them from branching out to the online market, e-books, audio-books or even selling Harry Potter fan fiction for a change.

The fact is, if they those 4 bookstores quite whining and sold HP:TDH as before, they would still have made a profit off them. Haven’t they heard the news of hypermarts not having enough stock? The MidValley for example, no stock in Carrefour would mean people would go back to MPH for their RM109.90 books!

PS: This topic brings me to another issue I wanted to rant earlier. Why the heck is a supposedly children’s book on sale for RM109.90? Who are they kidding? I won’t even buy it at that price. Not that Wikipedia’s entry doesn’t sum up the synopsis nicely.

Tell you what, after their meeting next week (which the agenda would probably cover the loss of profit over their childishness), they would resume selling the books. Afterall they do have loads in stores that need to go somewhere.

7 Comments »

  1. “Hypermarts stock up the latest and best sellers but people still do visit a bookstore for other non-mainstream books.”

    But we’re seeing fewer and fewer of those kinds of books every year. It used to be that sales from major bestsellers could cover for whatever losses a store might incur for stocking on a low-selling but important work. But you take that away from bookstores, what do they have left? More and more bookstores are closing down, or resorting to selling CDs, or pushing out the low-selling books just to stay alive. All because of hypermarkets which have completely different priorities than book retailers and publishers.

    Not saying that there isn’t a certain level of hypocrisy on the part of the bookstore chains. But long-term, this ain’t healthy, folks.

    Comment by Jeffrey — 22 July, 2007 @ 9:12 pm

  2. Price control is important to a certain extent. It is no doubt a free market, but it won’t be a market at all if prices are abused. There are reasons why unions/associations are established. The implications may not be clear if I were to just say it this way, nevertheless the effects are significant.

    Comment by Tze Lun — 22 July, 2007 @ 9:34 pm

  3. [...] Harry Potter Price War [...]

    Pingback by All the Harry Potter (Malaysian-Related) News | shoppingNsales — 23 July, 2007 @ 2:15 am

  4. I don’t understand the mentality of some of you people. What is the freaking wrong with TESCO and Carrefour selling at RM69.90?
    And what’s the fuss about?
    SO WHAT if the hypermarket is undercutting?
    If you can get a book at a lower price, YOU BUY IT!
    So, why want to buy the book at RM109.90? Because your principles? Because you want to prove to other people that you can afford a RM100+ book? or you just want to brag about it?

    and about marketing. Do you really think that a book that people has been anticipating for 2 years NEEDS to advertise it to the fans? People has been hoping to get it EARLIER by one year or 2. So, saying that the hypermarkets are stealing the bookstores hard earn thunder is just crap. Harry Potter is a name people want to “ride” on it’s popularity.

    Another thing, what’s the freaking deal about “cheap”?
    Does that mean that my cousin who is a fanatic Harry Potter fan is a “fake” fan because she bought it at RM69.90, while my friend who bought it at RM109.90 because he just want to read it because his girlfriend is a huge fan is a REAL fan?

    What kind of illogical, mentality or absurdness is this? I don’t understand you all, when you all can buy pirate CDs/DVDs, but shouts “FOUL”, when a highly popular book is given a huge discounts.

    I am just sad that “common sense” is just a myth nowadays. While “illogical” stuff like, “hey, buying at RM69.90 is bad, we should buy at RM109.90.”

    What the hell is going on in this world? or in the minds of Malaysians? I hope someone can figure it out, because I can’t.

    Comment by The Doctor — 23 July, 2007 @ 10:07 am

  5. I’m always worried when people leaving comments agree with me but complains in the first person as in using the word (’don’t understand YOU’).

    ;P

    Comment by ωϊΪΪϊαm §öö — 23 July, 2007 @ 11:00 am

  6. I’d hate using the word ‘you people’. For one, it’s stereotyping. Two, it looks as though its a personal assault. And three, a clear sign of self-centrednes.

    Opinions differ, rarely can we come to a conclusion of who is right and who is wrong.

    Comment by Tze Lun — 23 July, 2007 @ 11:48 am

  7. You can say whatever you want about me, be it a personal assault, self-centredness or stereotyping or whatever, it just suits me fine…… I am only telling what I think is a fact or common sense, and also, that’s my style of telling.

    Comment by The Doctor — 23 July, 2007 @ 1:38 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.